Cases 1 - 10 of 525
Nguida et al v. National Labor Relations Board et al
as 8:2024cv02135
Defendant:
Michael Waltz, Office of Inspector General, National Labor Relations Act and others
Plaintiff:
Martha Adrien and Mohamed Nguida
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Yapp USA Automotive Systems, Inc v. National Labor Relations Board et al
as 2:2024cv12173
Defendant:
MARVIN E. KAPLAN, ARTHUR AMCHAN, LAUREN McFERRAN and others
Plaintiff:
Yapp USA Automotive Systems, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SULLIVAN v. FAIRFIELD PARSIPPANY, LLC
as 2:2024cv08413
Respondent:
FAIRFIELD PARSIPPANY, LLC
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Pan American Grain Manufacturing v. National Labor Relations Board
as 3:2024cv01274
Defendant:
David Cohen and National Labor Relations Board
Plaintiff:
Pan American Grain Manufacturing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sacks v. I.N.S.A., Inc.
as 24-1569
Interested Party:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION
Petitioner:
LAURA A. SACKS, Regional Director, Region 1, National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
I.N.S.A., INC.
NLRB v. Todd
as 2:2024cv01642
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Sharlyn Todd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
NLRB v. Wilton Rancheria
as 2:2024cv01477
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Wilton Rancheria
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
NLRB v. BGM Co. Inc.
as 2:2024cv01476
Respondent:
BGM Co. Inc.
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Sawyer v. Big Green
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
PAULA S. SAWYER, Regional Director of Region 27 of the National Labor Relations Board,
Defendant:
BIG GREEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
