Cases 1 - 8 of 8
McCain et al v. D & R Construction and Contracting, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Michael McCain, James D. Hornsby and Southern Electrical Retirement Fund
Defendant:
D & R Construction and Contracting, LLC and Richard Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SESSOMS et al v. PARADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv17060
Defendant:
PARADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, MAHESH PATEL, BHAVESH PATEL and others
Plaintiff:
TITANIA LYLES, LASHIDA SESSOMS, TRINA PEREIRA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harris Law Firm, LLP v. Martinez et al
as 2:2017cv02827
Defendant:
Enrico Fazzini, M.D., Daniel L. Burkhead, M.D., LTD dba Innovative Pain Care Center, MD Spine Solutions, LLC dba MD Labs and others
Plaintiff:
Harris Law Firm, LLP dba Richard Harris Law Firm and Harris Law Firm, LLP doing business as Richard Harris Law Firm
Counter Defendant:
Harris Law Firm, LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Harris v. Broncs, Inc
as 7:2016cv00302
Defendant:
Broncs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Harris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Harris vs. DVE Management, Inc.
as 7:2016cv00254
Defendant:
DVE Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Harris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HARRIS v. BRONCS, INC
as 2:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS, JR.
Defendant:
BRONCS, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Unite Here Health v. Paulucci et al
as 2:2013cv01599
Defendant:
Danny Doyle, Harris Law Firm, LLP, Nicholas Paulucci and others
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
James Galbert et al v. Cashcall Inc et al
as 8:2007cv00831
Plaintiff:
James Galbert, James Galbert, Richard Harris and others
Defendant:
Cashcall Inc, Paul Reddam and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
