Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Stith v. Michael S. Rea, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00436
Defendant:
MICHAEL S REA, DAVID HESS, Michael S. Rea, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUI STITH, SR and Marqui Stith, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ankarlo et al v. City of Chicago Heights
as 1:2019cv03776
Plaintiff:
William Biedenharn, Thomas Somer, Matthew Spain and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago Heights and City of Chicago Heights Illinois
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
National Labor Relations Board v. Stith
as 1:2016cv02856
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Stanley Stith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
BUTLER et al v. INVENTIV HEALTH, INC.
as 3:2016cv02903
Plaintiff:
KEITH BUTLER , BRIAN STITH and TRINETTE VANDERPOEL
Defendant:
INVENTIV HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Stith v. Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company
as 1:2014cv02335
Plaintiff:
William Stith
Defendant:
Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Brian Warch v. International Longshoremen
as 13-2443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN WARCH and SAMUEL THAMES
Plaintiff:
ABRAM SEWELL and RODNEY STITH
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 333, STEAMSHIP TRADE ASSOCIATION, MTC and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC., CERES TERMINALS, INCORPORATED, MID-ATLANTIC TERMINALS/WWL and others
:
and
Sewell et al v. Local 333, International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO et al
as 1:2012cv00044
Plaintiff:
Abram Sewell , Rodney Stith , Brian Warch and others
Defendant:
International Longshoremen's Association, Local 333, Steamship Trade Association, MTC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Yarbrough et al v. Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02144
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Yarbrough , Joseph Magliozzi , Ronald Debideen and others
Defendant:
Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
