Cases 91 - 100 of 10,176
Seguin v. Rhode Island Department of Human Services, et al
as 24-1313
Plaintiff:
MARY SEGUIN
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, in its official capacity, RHODE ISLAND OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, in its official capacity, GERO MEYERSIEK, in his individual and official capacity and others
Ruiz-Romero v. Toro-Velez, et al
as 24-1346
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
LISSETTE TORO-VELEZ and PABLO COLON-SANTIAGO
LaFlamme v. Town of North Kingstown et al
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Alan LaFlamme
Defendant:
Town of North Kingstown, Debra Bridgham, Patrick Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
dais deapocalypse bey v. Clapprood, et al
as 24-1312
Plaintiff:
RA DAIS DEAPOCALYPSE BEY
Defendant:
CHERYL CLAPPROOD, Superintendent, Springfield Police Department and CRAIG MOREL, President, CJ Towing
Ruiz-Romero v. Department of State of Puerto Rico, et al
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUERTO RICO and PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO
Parlon v. The United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv10886
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Parlon
Defendant:
The United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Shoba Sivaprassad Wadhia and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Cogley v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 24-1309
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COGLEY
Defendant:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode Island Governor 2013-2015 in his official capacity, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Rhode Island Governor 2015-2021 in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. O'Malley, et al
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
DANNY M. KELLY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
