Cases 91 - 100 of 588
Doe v. Young et al
as 3:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Rebecca Young, Tykeshae Fowlkes, OKOLI NKEMDLILIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gil v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Patrick Nilo Gil
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Lt. Fowlkes, Sgt. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Parks v. Clarke et al
as 3:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Dolly Yvonne Parks
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, A. David Robinson, Stephen M. Herrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 4:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Community College System and Thomas Nelson Community College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Osborne v. Jane Doe et al
as 4:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Osborne
Defendant:
Jane Doe and The Fresh Market, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 - Title IX of the Education Amendment of 1972
Thomas v. Walgreen Co. et. al
as 1:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Dana Thomas
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
