Cases 91 - 100 of 9,549
LIGON v. CLARK et al
as 2:2023cv02156
Petitioner:
TYRECE LIGON
Respondent:
GINA CLARK, THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Rollins v. Edrehi et al
as 3:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Sandra Rollins
Defendant:
Clark Edrehi, Mary Swenson, William Swenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JACKSON v. BRICKMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Defendant:
A. BRICKMAN, SARAH K., HOLLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Michaud v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
John Michaud
Defendant:
Superintendent Gina Clark and Sergeant King-Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
HUERTAS v. CLARK et al
as 2:2023cv01685
Plaintiff:
HECTOR HUERTAS
Defendant:
GINA CLARK and MADELINE QUINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WISE v. CLARK et al
as 2:2023cv01528
Plaintiff:
JON WISE
Defendant:
KRISTEN CLARK and CHERYL HELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
CLARK v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
CARL CLARK
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
