Cases 91 - 100 of 979
Carpenter v. USA
as 3:2021cv01485
Petitioner:
Daniel E. Carpenter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Hahn v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01030
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Hahn
Defendant:
USA, US Post Office, Ann Marie Coddett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Davison et al
as 3:2021mc00049
Receiver:
Burton W. Wiand
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Brian Davison, Barry M. Rybicki, Equialt LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Li v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Dongmei Li
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Standard Maerkel v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00897
Plaintiff:
Deborah E. Standard Maerkel
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coury v. Cactus Coatings, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00860
Defendant:
Cactus Coatings, Inc. and G.G. Marck & Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Coury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eitan Segal Law Office et al v. Hecht et al
as 3:2021cv00753
Defendant:
Samuel Hecht, Zevulun Associates, LLC, 173-175 Park LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Eitan Segal and Eitan Segal Law Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Breton v. Lamont et al
as 3:2021cv00719
Defendant:
A. Hanna, Ned Lamont, Gordils and others
Plaintiff:
Randy E. Breton, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrill v. Hyman et al
as 3:2021cv00551
Defendant:
Dean F Hyman, Frederick L Hyman, Kenneth M Hyman and others
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Merrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
