Cases 91 - 100 of 113
Morton v. Guntersville City Jail et al
as 4:2009cv01199
Plaintiff:
Denny Ray Morton
Defendant:
Guntersville City Jail and Grady Baugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Guntersville City Jail et al
as 4:2009cv01175
Plaintiff:
Denny Ray Morton
Defendant:
Guntersville City Jail, Grady Baugh, Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Guntersville City Jail
as 4:2009cv01132
Plaintiff:
Denny Ray Morton
Defendant:
Guntersville City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Daniels et al
as 4:2008cv02415
Petitioner:
Charles Michael Morton
Respondent:
Laposey Daniels and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morton v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2008cv02263
Petitioner:
Mark Twain Morton
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al (MAG+)
as 2:2008cv00847
Plaintiff:
Brian Williams
Defendant:
Montgomery County Board of Education, Montgomery County Board of Education, Joseph B. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Cordar v. Morton et al
as 2:2008cv01717
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Cordar
Defendant:
Danny Morton, Wess Neil, R Mack Kent and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaw v. Morton et al
as 2:2008cv01606
Plaintiff:
Jody Lee Shaw
Defendant:
Danny Morton, Wes Neil, R Mack Kent and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reed v. Morton et al
as 2:2008cv01532
Plaintiff:
Roy Joseph William Reed
Defendant:
Danny Morton, Wes Neil, Mack Kent and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
