Cases 91 - 100 of 2,433
Cartagena et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv08711
Plaintiff:
Israel Cartagena, Annieli Acevedo, Maryalice Alston-Harris and others
Defendant:
City of New York and New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bennett v. Acevedo et al
as 1:2023cv07389
Plaintiff:
Renee Bennett
Defendant:
Miguel Acevedo and Ryder Truck Rental Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
(PC) Snow v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
Stephen F. Snow
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Jennifer P. Shaffer, S. Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cresencia Acevedo v. Walmart, Inc.
as 5:2023cv01972
Plaintiff:
Cresencia Acevedo
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Constantino Joshua Acevedo v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2023cv01922
Plaintiff:
Constantino Joshua Acevedo, III
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Chad Bianco, Victoria Varisco-Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Constantino Joshua Acevedo v. City of Fontana et al
as 5:2023cv01923
Plaintiff:
Constantino Joshua Acevedo, III
Defendant:
City of Fontana, Dustin Mullins, John Piehnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Yuwsuf Ghafoor, et al v. Professional Transportation, Incorporated, et al
as 23-2813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YUWSUF A. GHAFOOR, ELIZABETH A. ACEVEDO, RICHIE L. ACEVEDO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED, an Indiana corporation licensed to conduct business in Illinois and RONALD D. ROMAIN
Acevedo v. US Railroad Retirement Board
as 2:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Robert R Acevedo
Defendant:
US Railroad Retirement Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
