Cases 91 - 100 of 100
Annamalai v. Dhillon et al
as 3:2016cv03290
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai
Defendant:
Sukhinder Kaur Dhillon, Anuradha Reddy, Baskaran Vengesanam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Annamalai v. Rajkumar et al
as 1:2016cv04491
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai
Defendant:
Chablall Rajkumar, Kavita Jacobson, Violet Rajkumar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANNAMALAI v. SEKAR et al
as 2:2016cv03415
Plaintiff:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Defendant:
VANAJA SEKAR, MANISHA JASTI, VASUNDHARA KRISHNAMOHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Annamalai v. Paramasivam et al
as 1:2016cv06079
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai
Defendant:
Gopalakrishnan Paramasivam, Vijayal Gopalakrishnan, Sireesha Iruvuri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Annamalai v. Laird et al
as 3:2016cv00524
Petitioner:
Annamalai Annamalai
Respondent:
Paul M. Laird, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Maureen P. Baird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Annamalai Annamalai
as 16-12140
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI, a.k.a. Dr. Commander Selvam a.k.a. Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Annamalai v. Moon Credit Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01277
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai
Defendant:
Moon Credit Corporation, John Moon, Jr, Larry Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Annamalai Annamalai v. Lloyd Whitaker
as 16-90004
Petitioner:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Respondent:
LLOYD WHITAKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00554
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
ANNAMALAI v. VENUGOPALAN et al
as 3:2016cv00021
Plaintiff:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Defendant:
GOPAKUMAR VENUGOPALAN, CHANDRAMOHAN LOGANATHAN, VALMIKINATHAN RAGHUNATHAN and others
Amicu:
Ronald Kozar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
