Cases 91 - 100 of 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Alverson v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00526
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Bill Gates, State of Alabama, The and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Frazier
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles , Cynthia Dillard , Eddie Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Benion v. Nielsen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00785
Plaintiff:
Reginald A. Benion
Defendant:
Robert Nielsen, Alabama Board of Pardons and Parole and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malloy v. Wise et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00964
Plaintiff:
Arthur Brennan Malloy
Defendant:
David Wise, Troy King and The Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00933
Plaintiff:
Gloria D. Bennett
Defendant:
Alabama Dept. of Corrections and Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grundy v. Allen et al
as 4:2009cv00515
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Grundy
Defendant:
Richard Allen, David Wise, Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henry v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00215
Plaintiff:
Bruce Henry
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Taylor v. Allen et al
as 1:2009cv00079
Plaintiff:
Terrance Taylor
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Charles A. Graddick, Alabama Board of Pardon and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
