Cases 91 - 100 of 112
CURRY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2012cv00338
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS CURRY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Artalejo et al v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00719
Plaintiff:
Jesus Artalejo , Tammy Brooke , Crystal Bryant and others
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Inc and Biomet LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
ROBEY v. CURRY
as 1:2012cv01201
Defendant:
TERRY R. CURRY
Plaintiff:
RICKEY L. ROBEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. ZOELLER et al
as 1:2012cv01093
Defendant:
ANGELA K COOK, BARBARA COOK-CRAWFORD, TERRY CURRY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DALE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LANE v. CURRY
as 1:2012cv01091
Defendant:
TERRY R. CURRY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL V. LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROGERS v. CURRY et al
as 1:2012cv00935
Plaintiff:
YEHOCHANAN ABIJAH and CHRISTOPHER ROGERS
Defendant:
TERRY CURRY and JEREMY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. Thoma et al
as 1:2012cv00173
Plaintiff:
Donte Curry
Defendant:
Mark A Thoma and Allen County Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIGSBY v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2012cv00709
Plaintiff:
NICK BIGSBY
Defendant:
CARL BRIZZI, TIM CURRY, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. Saint Joseph Hospital et al
as 1:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
Donte Curry
Defendant:
Saint Joseph Hospital, Angela M Bickel, Jessica Wyss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOLIS v. CURRY et al
as 1:2012cv00301
Defendant:
KAREN S. CURRY, HEARTLAND FOODS, INC., HEARTLAND FOODS, INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN and others
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
