Cases 91 - 100 of 222
Watson v. Illinois Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2014cv02210
Plaintiff:
Jerome E Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Illinois Attorney General Office, Illinois State Police, Illinois Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Illinois Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2014cv01993
Petitioner:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Respondent:
Illinois Attorney General Office, Cook County State's Attorney Office, Cook County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2014cv01592
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Illinois State Police, Illinois Attorney General Office, Illinois Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Cook County D.O.C. Administration et al
as 1:2014cv00518
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Cook County D.O.C. Administration, Thomas Dart, Mauricee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv09280
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anthony Allen Oliver v. California Dept of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2013cv02225
Defendant:
E Arvizu, E Arvizu, Jeffrey P Beard and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen Oliver
Rodney Watson v. Martin Frink, et al
as 13-36135
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY E. WATSON
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTIN FRINK and STATE OF MONTANA
Mark Macy v. Barry Watson, et al
as 13-36083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK MARION MACY
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRY E. WATSON, DAVID ROBINS and NANCY ALBRERS
Turner v. McCall et al
as 1:2013cv01611
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Turner
Defendant:
J. McCall, M. Lukas, S. Hatton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clyde Collins, et al v. Carey Ebert, et al
as 13-11027
Debtor:
In the Matter of: MARANATHA ROOFING COMPANY
Appellant:
CLYDE W. COLLINS and BETTY J. COLLINS
Appellee:
CAREY DALTON EBERT, HOWARD E. WATSON, III, SYDNEY WATSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
