Cases 91 - 100 of 1,235
FAKHRY v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2008cv01766
Plaintiff:
FRANCOIS BOUTROS FAKHRY
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF and EMILIO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Marileia Podavin v. Greg Collett
as 08-2113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARILEIA PODAVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD CATERISANO, District Director, U.S. CItizenship and Immigration Services, Baltimore, Maryland, GREG COLLETT, District Director, U.S. CItizenship and Immigration Services, Baltimore, Maryland, EMILIO GONZALEZ, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Washington, DC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv06591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Denial of Application for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv06604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv08357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv05286
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv04532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv06256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
