Cases 91 - 100 of 209
Evans v. Doe Sheriff's Deputy #1 et al
as 3:2017cv06046
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Evans
Defendant:
John Doe Sheriff's Deputy #1, Jane Doe Wife, John Doe Sheriff's Deputy #2 and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Correct Care Solutions LLC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Pierce County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Thurston County et al
as 3:2017cv05987
Plaintiff:
Nicola O Evans
Defendant:
Thurston County and Thurston County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garrison v. Price et al
as 2:2017cv00349
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Garrison
Defendant:
Michael P Price, Annette S Plese, Larry Haskill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Washington State Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv05728
Plaintiff:
William Washington
Defendant:
Washington State Dept of Corrections, Steven Sinclair, Kevin Bovenkamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell et al v Tulalip Tribes of Washington
as 2:2017cv01279
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mitchell , Patricia S. Johanson-Mitchell , Buckley Evans and others
Defendant:
Tulalip Tribes of Washington
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Evans & Korth v Oh Nuts of Monsey Inc
as 3:2017cv05468
Plaintiff:
Evans & Korth
Defendant:
Oh Nuts of Monsey Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Evans v. Meridian Financial Services Inc
as 1:2017cv03107
Plaintiff:
Scott Dani Evans
Defendant:
Meridian Financial Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Gary Evan Randall
as 2:2017rd00028
Plaintiff:
Gary Evan Randall
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Hunt v. Renton Municipal Court et al
as 2:2017cv00612
Petitioner:
Rene Evans Hunt
Respondent:
Renton Municipal Court and SCORE Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carnahan v. Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
Evan L Carnahan
Defendant:
Alpha Epsilon PI Fraternity Inc and David Leon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
