Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,306
Mindy Hill v. FCC
as 23-1352
Petitioner: MINDY HILL
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Consumers' Research, et al v. FCC, et al
as 23-1091
Petitioner: Consumers' Research, Cause Based Commerce, Inc., Edward J. Blum and others
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
SGCI Holdings III LLC, et al v. FCC
as 23-1083
Appellant: SGCI Holdings III LLC, TEGNA Inc. and CMG Media Corporation
Appellee: Federal Communications Commission
Sean Patterson, et al v. FCC
as 23-55255
Plaintiff / Appellant: SEAN PATRICK PATTERSON and MAFIA MONTHLY
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, official capacity
Dahua Technology USA Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 23-1073
Petitioner: Dahua Technology USA Inc.
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
WILLSEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff: DONALD BRENT WILLSEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Dahua Technology, USA Inc v. Federal Communications Commission
as 09/1:23-CA-00206
Plaintiff: Dahua Technology, USA Inc
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Petitioner: Dahua Technology USA, Inc.
Hikvision USA, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as DC/1:23-CA-01032
Petitioner: Hikvision USA, Inc.
Defendant: FCC
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Hill v. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00424
Plaintiff: Mindy Hill
Defendant: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Dahua Technology USA, Inc v. Federal Communications Commission
as 23-206
Petitioner: DAHUA TECHNOLOGY USA, INC
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?