Cases 91 - 100 of 242
NIBLACK v. MALBREEN et al
as 3:2015cv05298
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK
Defendant:
MALBREEN, BARNES , TOGNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARISTEO v. RAINES et al
as 1:2015cv04115
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ARISTEO
Defendant:
JODY RAINES, WEBMARCOM LLC, MICHELE MOKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
S.A. v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2015cv03565
Plaintiff:
S.A.
Defendant:
EVELYN DAVIS , ROBERT BEUCHELE , NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN v. SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL et al
as 3:2015cv03371
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH MATHEWS PITTMAN
Defendant:
SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. LANIGAN, et al
as 2:2015cv03205
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE L. BRYANT
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, PATRICK NOGAN and GUY CIRILLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Paladino v. K. Newsome, et al
as 15-2058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN PALADINO
Defendant - Appellee:
K. NEWSOME, SHIRLEY STEPHENS, GARY M. LANIGAN and others
CAPERS v. LANIGAN
as 1:2015cv02303
Plaintiff:
KEITH MICHAEL CAPERS
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDUR-RAHEEM v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2015cv01743
Plaintiff:
SHAMSIDDIN A. ABDUR-RAHEEM
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, STEPHEN D'ILIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 3:2015cv01372
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, ALLEN MARTIN, MR. D'ILIO and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMART v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2015cv01065
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
ANGEL SANTIAGO, GARY M. LANIGAN and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.