Cases 91 - 100 of 1,201
Davis v. Carr et al
as 7:2022cv01432
Plaintiff:
Tymon L Davis
Defendant:
Greg Carr and K Straka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Straka et al
as 7:2022cv01387
Petitioner:
Eric Daniel Jennings
Respondent:
K Straka and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Day v. Alabama Department of Mental Health (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Day
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Take Resource Center
as 2:2022cv01322
Plaintiff:
Miss DeKorrie K Bell
Defendant:
Take Resource Center and Daronesha Duncan Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilson v. Straka
as 7:2022cv01309
Petitioner:
Lavarice Wilson
Respondent:
K Straka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gardner v. Walmart Inc
as 3:2022cv01293
Plaintiff:
Sherry K. Gardner
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Day v. Alabama Department of Mental Health (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Day
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Ms. Cooper et al
as 5:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Martel Robinson
Defendant:
Ms. Cooper, K Cash, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy v. K-VA-T Food Stores Inc
as 4:2022cv01164
Plaintiff:
Robbie Roy
Defendant:
K-VA-T Food Stores Inc doing business as Food City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Dees v. Peters et al
as 5:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Defendant:
K. Peters, Morgan, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
