Cases 91 - 100 of 1,636
LEWIS v. DOE et al
as 2:2022cv02891
Plaintiff:
ANDRE LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and MS. STICKNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
KATRINA CASEY LEWIS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
THOMAS B. LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
LEWIS v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
as 2:2022cv02649
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DAVIS-LEWIS et al v. WALMART INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
KARMEN DAVIS-LEWIS and ROBERT LEWIS
Defendant:
WALMART INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP trading and doing business as WALMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BROWN v. WALKER et al
as 2:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR A. BROWN
Defendant:
CAPTAIN WALKER, CHAPLAIN LEWIS, C.O. 1 COSTELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boldrini v. Jane Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Ms KTT Jane Doe, Mr. Siedel John Doe (D), Mr. Chris Hill, U.S.M.2019-2022 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWIS et al v. ROHO, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02122
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEWIS and DIANE LEWIS
Defendant:
ROHO, INC. and THE ROHO GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEWIS v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv02103
Plaintiff:
SANDRA LEWIS
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CAMPBELL v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
JACOB CAMPBELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL LEWIS and TIMOTHY MORANDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
