Cases 91 - 100 of 368
Crayola Properties, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2020cv06593
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Lulala Store, For your Lover Store and others
Plaintiff:
Crayola Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01176
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01006
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01029
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Gregory v. Saul
as 1:2020cv05813
Defendant:
Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Megan Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Livingstone v. DeVry University, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05567
Defendant:
Adtalem Global Education Inc., Arissa Bryant, Deb Koffman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael O Livingstone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Kenworthy et al
as 1:2020cv05150
Plaintiff:
Craig E Johnson
Defendant:
Kathyleen Cossata, Diana L Kenworthy, People of the State of Illinois/ State's Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04606
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kim et al v. H Guys, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03588
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kim, George Kim, Michael Kim and others
Defendant:
Steve H Chong, Megan M. Chong, H Guys, LLC Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Span v. Kordick et al
as 1:2020cv03563
Defendant:
Amanda Trantina, Shabbir Zacif, Megan M Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Span
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
