Cases 91 - 100 of 1,145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Walker v. Walker et al
as 1:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Wayne Walker
Defendant:
William Walker, Jeff Sorensen, Jack Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Chorbagian et al v. UNITED STATES of AMERICA,
as 1:2023cv11087
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Chorbagian, Mark Chorbagian, Rex Clark and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Nelson et al v. MillerKnoll, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00464
Defendant:
MillerKnoll, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc., George Nelson Foundation, The and others
Plaintiff:
Patrice Nelson and Georges Mico Nelson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Michigan, State of v. Wright
as 2:2023cv11069
Plaintiff:
Michigan, State of, Brian Wilson, Paul Flaviani and others
Defendant:
Michael Terry Wright
Myles #439074 v. Carr et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Kennith Myles #439074
Defendant:
Unknown Carr, Unknown Miller, Matt Macauley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Wayne et al
as 2:2023cv10986
Plaintiff:
Nicole Harris, Blanca Arguelles, Amber Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Officer Terri Graham and Terri Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Clayton v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv10993
Plaintiff:
Justin Clayton
Defendant:
Paul Smith, Rob Dorner, Kelly Miller and others
Tretchler v. Miller
as 1:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
Zachary Charles Tretchler
Respondent:
Brian S. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
