Cases 91 - 100 of 403
Gravley v. Bureau of Prison et al
as 1:2019cv01655
Defendant:
Psychologist, Colorado Super Max Prison and Bureau of Prison
Plaintiff:
Dwaune J. Gravley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2019cv01411
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, R. Hudgins and Hugh Hurwitz
Plaintiff:
Kenneth F. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Stribling v. Florence FCI Prison Administration
as 1:2019cv01109
Petitioner:
Allen Mendez Stribling
Respondent:
Florence FCI Prison Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hale v. Marques et al
as 1:2019cv00752
Defendant:
Rudy Marques, Christopher Synsvoll, D. Humphries and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew J.D. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jingles v. U.S Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2019cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Jingles
Defendant:
U.S Bureau of Prisons and M.A. Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Barnett v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2018cv03219
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States, The
Plaintiff:
Tracy Alan Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colley v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2018cv02116
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and M.A. Stancil
Petitioner:
Terry J. Colley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ryland v. Director of the Bureau of Prison[s], The et al
as 1:2018cv01893
Defendant:
Director of the Bureau of Prison[s], The, Koch, Silva and others
Plaintiff:
Corey R. Ryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodface v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2018cv01884
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Goddface and Richard Lee Goodface
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals, U.S. Attorney General and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Dhameja v. PTS of America, LLC
as 1:2018cv01661
Defendant:
PTS of America, LLC DBA Prisoner Transportation Services, John/Jane Does 1-20, PTS of America, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Rajkumar Dhameja
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
