Cases 91 - 100 of 205
Stone v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00715
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc., Biomet Manufacturing, LLC, Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Keara Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STONE v. TIPSORD et al
as 1:2018cv01867
Defendant:
SHAWN HIGGINS and MICHAEL L. TIPSORD
Plaintiff:
ALFRED L. STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
STONE v. CURTIS et al
as 1:2018cv01856
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN BROWN, MARK A. CASTEEL, NIKKI CURTIS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. STONE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Bowman et al
as 3:2018cv00348
Plaintiff:
Kiel Stone
Defendant:
Alex Christopher Bowman, Elizabeth A. Hardtke, Paul E Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. BOWMAN et al
as 1:2018cv01307
Defendant:
ALEX CHRISTOPHER BOWMAN, ELIZABETH A. HARDTKE, TIM MCLAUGHLIN and others
Plaintiff:
KIEL STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Jesse et al
as 3:2018cv00277
Plaintiff:
Kiel Stone
Defendant:
Steve Jesse, Brain McCall, Daniel Avitia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE-DUNLAP v. KNIGHT
as 1:2018cv00976
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JEAN'S EXTRUSIONS, INC. v. HANSON AGGREGATES MIDWEST LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00046
Defendant:
HANSON AGGREGATES MIDWEST LLC, HANSON AGGREGATES MIDWEST, INC., HOOSIER STONE & CONCRETE CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN'S EXTRUSIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2018cv00811
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone v. Sheikhuna et al
as 3:2018cv00180
Plaintiff:
Charles A Stone
Defendant:
Seydi K Sheikhuna and Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
