Cases 91 - 100 of 215
COTTON v. ROCKETT et al
as 3:2018cv02127
Defendant:
OFFICE OF STATE ATTORNEY, WELLS, ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL COTTON, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GULFSTREAM ICE CREAM v. WALTON COUNTY
as 3:2018cv02088
Plaintiff:
GULFSTREAM ICE CREAM
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MACIAS v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 3:2018cv01574
Defendant:
CAMERON JOHNSON, GAITHER, WALTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE MACIAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. ALCOVY JUDICIAL SYSTEM et al
as 3:2018cv00096
Respondent:
WALTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, WALTON COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER and others
Petitioner:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLESSEY JR v. WALTON COUNTY
as 3:2018cv01415
Plaintiff:
WALTER W BLESSEY, JR
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
PINKERMAN v. WALTON COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 3:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W PINKERMAN, II
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY GEORGIA and M FRAZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandra Vecchio v. Walton County Board
as 18-12335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA VECCHIO
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
WHITE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 3:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LAMAR WHITE, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, WALTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ALCOVY JUDICIAL CIRCUIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WALTON COUNTY GEORGIA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018op45297
Plaintiff:
WALTON COUNTY GEORGIA
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
