Cases 91 - 100 of 165
Lewis v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wayne Lewis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2015cv00512
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Page v. Blackwell et al
as 1:2015cv00996
Defendant:
Warden David Blackwell, Officer Mrs. Bond, EM Manager and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Lewis Page
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv07815
Plaintiff:
PAUL WAYNE LEWIS and WANDA LEWIS
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Kenneth Lewi
as 15-50643
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
In re: NFL Players Concussion
as 15-2272
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN TURNER, Subclass 2 Representative and SHAWN WOODEN, Subclass1 Representative
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES
Not Party - Appellant:
RAYMOND ARMSTRONG, NATHANIEL NEWTON, JR., LARRY BROWN and others
Movant - Appellant:
EVAN OGELSBY
Lewis v. Stephens
as 6:2014cv00848
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Lewis
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2014cv00835
Petitioner:
Billy Wayne Lewis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Douglas Lewis, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corre
as 14-14476
Petitioner - Appellant:
DOUGLAS WAYNE LEWIS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Lewis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2014cv00499
Petitioner:
Billy Wayne Lewis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
