Cases 91 - 100 of 405
Tankesly v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2018cv01058
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tankesly
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Monqie Skowronski, Pam Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02116
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Willis v. Athens Paper Company, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00221
Plaintiff:
Kelli Willis
Defendant:
Athens Paper Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Acklin et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
Paige Acklin , Steve Acuff , Michael L. Adkison and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Vecchio et al v. Taylor et al
as 3:2017cv01502
Plaintiff:
Sol David Vecchio, Josh D. Kukuk, Tyler C. Lane and others
Defendant:
Patricia Taylor, Ben Hall McFarlin, Jr., Barry R. Tidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Parker et al
as 3:2017cv01423
Plaintiff:
Howard Hawk Willis
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Centurion of Tennessee, Kenneth Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price et al v. City of Memphis
as 2:2017cv02772
Plaintiff:
Willis Price , Kevin Kerr and Deunta Youngblood
Defendant:
City of Memphis
Movant:
Bradley Jetmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Mays et al
as 3:2017cv01364
Plaintiff:
Felton Jackson
Defendant:
Tony Mays and Mack Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
