Cases 91 - 100 of 111,931
DEWITT v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
MARGARET MARIE DEWITT
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Staton et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
Brock M. Staton, M Lester and M Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARDEN v. CHARLES A. TINDLEY ACCELERATED SCHOOLS et al
as 1:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
SHAYNE HARDEN
Defendant:
CHARLES A. TINDLEY ACCELERATED SCHOOLS, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and TAMI TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAX v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT JAIL AND STAFF
as 1:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
NATISHA VERNELLE LAX
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT JAIL AND STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DUBOIS COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
JASON KEITH BROWN
Defendant:
DUBOIS COUNTY, SHERRIFF, JAIL COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, BUTLER, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Redding
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brian Johnson
Defendant:
Timothy Redding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
