Cases 91 - 100 of 130
Robinson v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 4:2009cv04004
Plaintiff:
Edgar W. Robinson
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abernathy v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2008cv04187
Plaintiff:
Winfer Abernathy and Winfer Abernathy
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. DeQueen and Eastern Railroad Company
as 4:2008cv04106
Plaintiff:
Joe Jones
Defendant:
DeQueen and Eastern Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2008cv00287
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Phillip A Thomas, Phillip A Thomas, Phillip A Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilson et al v. Brown et al
as 4:2008cv03666
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wilson and Tammy Wilson
Defendant:
Tracy Lynn Brown, Pansy Parks and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stoudt v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 6:2008cv06093
Plaintiff:
Theodore H Stoudt, Theodore H Stoudt, Theodore H Stoudt and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fogle v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2008cv01082
Plaintiff:
Horace E Fogle, Horace E Fogle, Horace E Fogle and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thornberry v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2008cv03606
Plaintiff:
Terry Thornberry
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Archer v. DeQueen and Eastern Railroad Company
as 4:2008cv04077
Plaintiff:
Richard Lewis Archer
Defendant:
DeQueen and Eastern Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2008cv01138
Plaintiff:
Louis C Brown
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
