Cases 91 - 100 of 8,749
Posey v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Steve Allen Posey
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree, Sgt. Anderson and Michael W. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Pfizer Pharmaceutical et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Dangelo Laquez Brown
Defendant:
Pfizer Pharmaceutical, Pathway Group Home, Journey Group Home Growth Develop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Calloway et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Rashad C. Lee
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Pamela Harris and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Carlos Jerome Turner
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree, Jeremy Pelzer and Byran McPhail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guevara v. Keyes (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Guevara
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pritchett v. Norman (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Lanair Pritchett
Defendant:
Tyler W. Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. McClain et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Steven Lavon Cobb
Defendant:
Antonio McClain, Steve Marshall and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Segrest v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Robert Segrest
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
