Cases 91 - 100 of 67,326
Demario-Miko v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv11058
Plaintiff:
Devin Demario-Miko
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
IOT INNOVATIONS LLC v. SAVANT SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2024cv11057
Plaintiff:
IOT INNOVATIONS LLC
Defendant:
SAVANT SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Overjet, Inc. v. VideaHealth, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10446
Plaintiff:
Overjet, Inc.
Defendant:
VideaHealth, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Porter Jr v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2024cv40061
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Porter Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Kathleen Wenzel and Worcester Recovery Center + Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Molyneux v. Commission of Social Security
as 1:2024cv11052
Plaintiff:
Felicia Molyneux
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
United States of America v. Pena
as 1:2024cv11061
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eva Pena
Hasan v. ECFMG et al
as 1:2024cv10438
Plaintiff:
Dr. Prof Syed MK Hasan
Defendant:
ECFMG, Francine Katz, Katherin Oleyn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Licht v. Zhao et al
as 1:2024cv10447
Plaintiff:
Leonard Licht
Defendant:
Changpeng Zhao, Binance Holdings LTD, d/b/a Binance.com, BAM Trading Services, Inc. d/b/a Binance.US and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Haley v. Warden Bowers
as 1:2024cv10458
Petitioner:
Mark Xavier Haley, II
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kersey v. My Job Mobile
as 1:2024cv11081
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
My Job Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
