Cases 101 - 110 of 424
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00420
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Human Rights Defense Center v. Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2020cv00379
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-10, MARY LOU MCDONOUGH and Prince George's County, Maryland
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Human Rights Defense Center v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 8:2020cv00381
Defendant:
Maryland Montgomery County, John and Jane Does 1-10 and Warden Suzy Malagaria
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Doe v. Uber Technologies et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
Mr. John Kenney, Jr, Mr. Charles Veney and Uber Technologies
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Borjas v. Yetnal House LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00269
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Yetnal House LLC and Ray Kim
Plaintiff:
Nolvia Lizbeth Garcia Borjas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Watkins v. Baltimore City et al
as 1:2020cv00208
Defendant:
Fatima Patterson, Oiuyemi Abiodun, Baltimore City and others
Plaintiff:
Nafiz Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Cofield et al v. Mc N Mc Recovery LLC et al
as 8:2019cv03599
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Dr. Keenan Cofield and Berri A. Wells
Defendant:
The Oaks at Waters Edge Condominium 1, Inc., Linda S. Mericle, Harding Brooks Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cofield et al v. Mc N Mc Recovery LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03599
Plaintiff:
Keenan Kester Cofield and Jane Doe
Defendant:
The Oaks at Waters Edge Condominium 1, Inc., Justin Cameron, Mericle S. Linda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Doe et al
as 8:2019cv03494
Defendant:
Zara USA, Inc. and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Pasita Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv
Roberts v. Doe et al
as 8:2019cv03495
Defendant:
Zara USA, Inc. and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Tyesha Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
