Cases 101 - 110 of 2,171
Hines v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Julius A Hines
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Warden Fox, Warden Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Ronald Odell King
Defendant:
Hobson Jessica Jones, Cam P John Goodwyne, John Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Sellers et al
as 2:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jones
Defendant:
Marcus Sellers and Brookside, Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pascal v. Brookside, Alabama, The Town of et al
as 2:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Anyl Pascal
Defendant:
Brookside, Alabama, The Town of, Michael Jones, James Savelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deljou et al v. Jones
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kamran Deljou and Roya Deljou
Defendant:
Charles Raybon Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hershiser v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jack Dennison Hershiser
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Elmore Correctional Facility, Bullock Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bowns et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Nathan Lamar Jones
Respondent:
N Bowns, W Davis, Pressly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lorenzo Jones
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Warden Noe, Leutinent Dent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
