Cases 101 - 110 of 204
Strotman v. Correct Care Solutions
as 1:2019cv00746
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Plaintiff:
Shane S. Strotman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARSON v WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00119
Defendant:
ANDREW LESLIE, KIM SMITH, DR. J.J.Z. HOLDREN and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. CARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Magee et al
as 1:2019cv00720
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Platt, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Jason Kowalski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELTER v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00415
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS WELTER
Defendant:
MARCY DUDDY, SCI FAYETTE, JOHN HOCHBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROMANELL v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00396
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROMANELL
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and DAVID DRUSKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MADDOX v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA'S DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv01384
Plaintiff:
TYRONE MADDOX
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA'S DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS and GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS SCI CHESTER et al
as 3:2019cv00489
Defendant:
MARK ROCHOVICH, KAREN BALUCHA, CORRECTIONS OFFICERS JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff:
TARA COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv00056
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE ROSS and TERRENCE ANDREWS
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, MD. PAUL NOEL, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEAVER v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00029
Defendant:
MD MUHAMMAD NAJI and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC
Plaintiff:
JASON WEAVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PEARSON v. NOEL et al
as 2:2019cv00177
Plaintiff:
RICKY PEARSON
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL, ROBERT GILMORE, MR. HAMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
