Cases 101 - 110 of 132
Flash Dancers Gentlemen's Club et al v. City of Arlington Texas et al
as 4:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
Flash Dancers Gentlemen's Club and Ryan Grant
Defendant:
City of Arlington Texas, M Avant, J Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowden et al v. Wilemon et al
as 4:2011cv00711
Plaintiff:
Richard B Bowden and Susan Bowden
Defendant:
Kathryn Wilemon, Etta Hulme and City of Arlington TX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. City of Arlington
as 4:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hill
Defendant:
City of Arlington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pierce v. The City of Arlington et al
as 4:2011cv00193
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pierce
Defendant:
The City of Arlington , James Hawthorne , D Vo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Arlington et al
as 3:2011cv00233
Plaintiff:
Eric Williams
Defendant:
City of Arlington, Arlington Police and National Football League
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Arlington et al
as 4:2011cv00093
Plaintiff:
Eric Williams
Defendant:
City of Arlington, Arlington Police, National Football League and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron v. City of Arlington et al
as 2:2010cv01879
Plaintiff:
Curt Allen Byron
Defendant:
City of Arlington and Jared Babich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wadley v. City of Arlington, Texas et al
as 4:2010cv00453
Plaintiff:
Vincent G. Wadley
Defendant:
City of Arlington, Texas and Juan M. Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Arlington, Texas v. FCC, et al
as 10-60039
Petitioner:
CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS
Intervenor:
EMR POLICY INSTITUTE, CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
