Cases 101 - 110 of 416
(PS) Briggs v Putin, et al
as 2:2020cv01753
Plaintiff:
Vikki Lynn Briggs
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Lee and Assoc., Sheraton Grand Hotel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Saeteurn et al v. Dobson, et al.,
as 2:2020at00836
Plaintiff:
Sandy Saeteurn, Meuy Saechao, Nai Saeteurn and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and Joshua Dobson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Sacramento v. FAA, et al
as 20-72150
Petitioner:
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
Respondent:
STEPHEN M. DICKSON, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
(PC) Lucas v. City of Sacramento Police Dept. et al
as 2:2020cv01441
Defendant:
Sacramento County Superior Courts, Sacramento County D.A.'s Office, Brandon Lundgren and others
Plaintiff:
Mack Lucas, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020cv01376
Defendant:
Lorenzo Vidales, JMA Ventures, LLC, Sacramento Downtown Arena, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Avila and Mark Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020at00673
Defendant:
Lorenzo Vidales, JMA Ventures, LLC, Universal Protection Service, LP and others
Petitioner:
Mark Matthews
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020at00648
Defendant:
ERIC KLOCKENBRINK, City of Sacramento, ANTHONY BOLER and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipeles v. City of Sacramento
as 2:2020at00650
Plaintiff:
Jack Robert Lipeles
Defendant:
City of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
King v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020cv01326
Defendant:
Eric Klockenbrink, City of Sacramento, Anthony Boler and others
Plaintiff:
Travis King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipeles v. City of Sacramento
as 2:2020cv01328
Plaintiff:
Jack Robert Lipeles
Defendant:
City of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
