Cases 101 - 110 of 199
Williams v. Schofield et al
as 3:2012cv00667
Plaintiff:
James Dillon Williams
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Tony Howerton, Dan Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cravens v. Smith et al
as 2:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
James Cravens
Defendant:
Tony Choate, Faye Smith, Dan Harding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United Community Bank v. Blythe Properties et al
as 1:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
United Community Bank
Defendant:
Blythe Properties, Walter Dan Jones and Jim C Dye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cloyd v. Dulin et al
as 3:2012cv01088
Plaintiff:
La'Roy Jonathan Cloyd
Defendant:
Vernestene Dulin , L. McKendra, Ray Doizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Corizon Healthcare, Inc et al (TVV)
as 3:2012cv00550
Plaintiff:
David T Hubbard
Defendant:
Corizon Healthcare, Inc, Ronald Higgs and Dan Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gifford v. D.C.S.O., et al
as 3:2012cv01066
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Gifford
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Dan Weikal, Jamie Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Howerton et al (TVV)
as 3:2012cv00538
Plaintiff:
Prentiss Phillips
Defendant:
Tony Howerton, Dan Walker, James Higgs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012mc00072
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams and Robyn Kelley
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
Baker v. Welch et al
as 3:2012cv00946
Plaintiff:
Carl Baker
Defendant:
Antoinette Welch and Dan Warlick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
