Cases 101 - 110 of 236
Sturges v. Heyns et al
as 2:2014cv14120
Plaintiff:
Deandre Sturges
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Cindi Curtin, Bonita Hoffner and others
Collins v. Heyns et al
as 2:2014cv14105
Plaintiff:
Carlos Collins
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns and Rhodes
Davis #476773 v. Sherry et al
as 2:2014cv00219
Plaintiff:
Carnell Davis #476773
Defendant:
Jerry Ann Sherry, Daniel H. Heyns, Cheri Konrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 14-2298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE ARTHUR J. TARNOW, BERNARD FREIDMAN, PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Edwin Lewis v. Mildred Smoker, et al
as 14-2254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN DUANE LEWIS, named on initiating document as Edwin Duane Lewis #227535
Defendant - Appellee:
MILDRED SMOKER, RUO, JAMES BRADLEY, ARUS, WARREN LINK, RUM (retired) and others
Hardy #215875 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00992
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Hardy #215875
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, C. Heffelbower, Catherine Stoddard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton #495156 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2014cv00972
Plaintiff:
Lamar Burton #495156
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Mary Berghuis, J. Verboncouer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Sango v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 14-2173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT D. SANGO
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, DAPHNE M. JOHNSON, JAMES MACEACHERN and others
Charles Runion v. Unknown Party #1, et al
as 14-2168
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES DARWIN RUNION
Respondent - Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as United States Congress Chairman, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, U.S. Attorney General, BILL SCHUETTE, Mich. Attorney General and others
Anthony Wills v. Melissa Barber, et al
as 14-2117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY THOMAS WILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
MELISSA BARBER, ERICA HUSS, JODY LEBARRE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
