Cases 101 - 110 of 246
Bruce Robbins, Sr. v. Glen Johnson
as 14-13086
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRUCE ROBBINS, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GLEN JOHNSON
Bustillo-Munguia v. Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Alex Emilo Bustillo-Munguia
Defendant:
Glen Johnson and Sharon Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindblom, Steven et al v. Moe, Donald et al
as 3:2014cv00478
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Lindblom and Maria J. G. Lindblom
Defendant:
Donald E. Moe, Anne M. Moe and Glen Johnson Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Sanders v. Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jonah Sanders
Defendant:
Glen Johnson and Edwina Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Charps Welding & Fabricating, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv02081
Plaintiff:
Glen Johnson , Timothy Gillen , Kyle Jones and others
Defendant:
Charps Welding & Fabricating, Inc. , Clearwater Energy Group, Inc. , C & G Construction Inc. of Clearbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Walter v. Owens et al
as 5:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jeneral Jarboe Walter
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Glen Johnson, Nathan Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Westmoreland v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv01315
Petitioner:
Amos Westmoreland, Jr.
Respondent:
Glen Johnson and Brian Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson et al v. ALH Survey Consultants LLC et al
as 0:2014cv00987
Plaintiff:
Glen Johnson , Timothy Gillen , Kyle Jones and others
Defendant:
ALH Survey Consultants LLC and Mary Katherine Forrest
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Aaron Obeginski v. Glen Johnson
as 14-10947
Petitioner - Appellant:
AARON LEIGH OBEGINSKI
Respondent - Appellee:
GLEN JOHNSON
Sanders v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jonah N. Sanders
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Glen Johnson, Micheal Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
