Cases 101 - 110 of 175
Dennis Campbell, et al v. FBI
as 13-3717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL and MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Dennis Campbell, et al v. USA, et al
as 13-3716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL and MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Dennis Campbell, et al v. United States Postal Service
as 13-3718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL
Plaintiff:
MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Campbell v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02693
Plaintiff:
John Campbell
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc and Wright Medical Group Inc
Campbell v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20865
Plaintiff:
John Campbell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Campbell v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:13-dp-20865
Plaintiff:
John Campbell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Campbell v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as FLS/9:13-cv-80688
Plaintiff:
John Campbell
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Campbell v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 9:2013cv80688
Plaintiff:
John Campbell
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wanda Williams, et al v. Governor of Pennsylvania, et al
as 13-1896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WANDA R.D. WILLIAMS, EUGENIA SMITH, BRAD KOPLINSKI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA and WILLIAM B. LYNCH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
