Cases 101 - 110 of 306
JERRI et al v. HARRAN et al
as 2:2013cv01328
Plaintiff:
DAVID JERRI, JR. and DAVID JERRI, SR.
Defendant:
FREDERICK HARRAN , BENSALEM TOWNSHIP , JOSEPH DIGIROLAMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KNIGHT v. H.O.C., HOUSE OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2013cv01208
Plaintiff:
LOVELL T. KNIGHT
Defendant:
H.O.C., HOUSE OF CORRECTION, HOBERT and ABRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BEALE v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BEALE
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DORINA VARNER, JEFFREY WITHERITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. FRANK'S KNIGHT HOUSE, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00153
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. , UNIVERSAL-SONGS OF POLYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC. , HIP CITY MUSIC, INC. and others
Defendant:
FRANK'S KNIGHT HOUSE, LLC and VINCENT T. FRANK
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Knight v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Darryl Knight
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
KNIGHT v. WALTON
as 2:2012cv01765
Plaintiff:
MELVIN KNIGHT
Defendant:
JOHN R. WALTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHT v. CMAR
as 2:2012cv01763
Plaintiff:
MELVIN KNIGHT
Defendant:
STEVEN J. CMAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHT v. ENCISO
as 2:2012cv01764
Plaintiff:
MELVIN KNIGHT
Defendant:
DEREK ENCISO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Gearhart et al
as 1:2012cv02410
Plaintiff:
Desmond Martin
Defendant:
Gearhart and Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 542 v. KNIGHT BROTHERS INCORPORATED
as 2:2012cv06530
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 542
Defendant:
KNIGHT BROTHERS INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
