Cases 101 - 110 of 309
Luis Lopez-Gomez v. William Barr
as 19-72158
Petitioner:
LUIS LOPEZ-GOMEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Mike Bulaon et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07343
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Courtesy Chevrolet Center, Paradise Chevrolet and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Lapier, John Andrade, Laura Huizar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HALL et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03065
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CHRASTKA, KEITH PETTY, EUGENE ROBERSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PEREZ et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03059
Plaintiff:
THELMORE CUMBY, AUSTIN DYER, SETH SOUTHERLAND and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
George Lopez v. USDC-CAFR
as 19-71940
Petitioner:
GEORGE LUIS LOPEZ
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GEORGE LUIS LOPEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Not Yet Classified:
JOEL D. MARTINEZ, Warden
Hall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02036
Plaintiff:
Matthew Chrastka, Keith Petty, Eugene Roberson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02024
Plaintiff:
Thelmore Cumby, Austin Dyer, Seth Southerland and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Mike Bulaon et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05205
Plaintiff:
Devon Lapier, John Andrade, Laura Huizar and others
Defendant:
Courtesy Chevrolet Center, General Motors LLC, Paradise Chevrolet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jorge Lopez-Arteaga v. William Barr
as 19-71454
Petitioner:
JORGE LUIS LOPEZ-ARTEAGA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv11721
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
