Cases 101 - 108 of 108
Moreau v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01960
Plaintiff:
Carol Lee Moreau
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Title 11 Holdings, LLC v. Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund, et al.
as 1:2007mc00056
Defendant:
Fidelity Capital Apprecation Fund, Robert G. Babson, James P. Barry and others
Plaintiff:
Title 11 Holdings, LLC
In Re: Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2007md01842
Plaintiff:
Deborah June Bilbrey, Wendy H. Risley, Lois Askins and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc, WCO Medical Products Corporation, Baolien Nguyen Tu and others
Interested Party:
Ernest Cory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cocklin v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2007cv00157
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Cocklin, Sr
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company and Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Boulanger v. US Marshal Service, New Hampshire District, Director et al
as 1:2007mc00023
Plaintiff:
Gerard Boulanger
Defendant:
US Marshal Service, New Hampshire District, Director, Linda Lee, Donna Roy and others
Campbell et al v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Campbell, Diane L. Campbell, Daniel Ray Patterson and others
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps Inc and General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Cahoon, Jr. et al v. Shelton et al
as 1:2007cv00008
Plaintiff:
Raymond W. Cahoon, Jr., Raymond W. Cahoon, Jr., Joseph A. Nappa and others
Defendant:
Oscar Shelton, Oscar Shelton, Scott Avedisian and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SEC v. Herula, et al
as 1:2002cv00154
Plaintiff:
SEC
Defendant:
Charles Sullivan, . , Estate of Martin D. Fife and Mary Lee Capalbo
Movant:
Marc D. Wallick and Oharacho Nogyo Kyodo Kumiai
Respondent:
Geragos & Geragos, Mark Geragos, George Buehler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
