Cases 101 - 110 of 138
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Franke
as 2:2012cv01438
Respondent:
Steve Franke
Petitioner:
C. Michael Gonzalez-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
C. Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Jeff Premo
as 12-35594
Petitioner - Appellant:
C. MICHAEL GONZALEZ-AGUILERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFF PREMO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Coursey
as 2:2012cv00687
Respondent:
Rick Coursey
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
C. Michael Gonzalez-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Cooke et al
as 1:2012cv00366
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Cooke and John (I) Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant Adams, et al v. USA, et al
as 12-5026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Grant O. Adams, Jimmy R. Anderson, Jose R. Arias and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Troy G. Avera, Jeffrey M. Bales, Michael W. Ballard and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Raymond L. LaHood, Secretary of Transportation and J. Randolph Babbitt, FAA Administrator
Clifford Morrison v. City of Ontario et al
as 5:2012cv00012
Defendant:
Michael Caldera, City of Ontario, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford Morrison
Noble v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv07216
Plaintiff:
Kotema Noble
Defendant:
City of New York, Michael Gonzalez, Konata Placide and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Branham v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04949
Plaintiff:
Kamel Branham
Defendant:
Police Officer Michael Gonzalez, Police Officer Michael Kotlyar, Police Officer Moses Lissette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Premo
as 6:2011cv01058
Petitioner:
C. Michael Gonzalez-Aguilera
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
