Cases 101 - 110 of 110
Watkins v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 3:2009cv00298
Plaintiff:
Charles E Watkins
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Noe Marandet, Michael Mitcheff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. MITCHEFF et al
as 2:2009cv00185
Plaintiff:
CHRITOPHER A SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, ROHONA, CARRIE HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Absher v. Donahue et al
as 3:2009cv00113
Plaintiff:
James Absher
Defendant:
J David Donahue, Ed Buss, Larry Shadley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KNIGHTEN v. MITCHEFF et al
as 1:2009cv00333
Plaintiff:
UNDRAY KNIGHTEN and UNDRAY KNIGHTEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BOWMAN v. BUSS et al
as 1:2009cv00119
Plaintiff:
JAMES DALE BOWMAN
Defendant:
EDWIN BUSS, BRETT MIZE, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stringer v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2008cv00567
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Stringer
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, J David Donahue, Indiana State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lampley v. Mitcheff et al
as 3:2008cv00282
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lampley
Defendant:
Dr Michael Mitcheff, Karla Foster, Dr Elton Amos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SWEENEY v MITCHEFF
as 2:2007cv00374
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SWEENEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLY v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2007cv00275
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER B BLY
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, ALFRED TALENS, ANWAR JAFFRI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLY v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2007cv00212
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER B BLY
Defendant:
WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY MEDICAL SERVICES, ALFRED TALENS, ANWAR JAFFRI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
