Cases 101 - 110 of 320
PETERSON v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2015cv00456
Plaintiff:
PAUL PETERSON
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
PETERSON v. OPRENDEK et al
as 1:2014cv00317
Plaintiff:
DANIEL F. PETERSON
Defendant:
ANTHONY C. OPRENDEK, BENJAMIN E. ZIMMER, JANE DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as 2:2014cv06388
Plaintiff:
PAMELA PETERSON and DAVID PETERSON
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY, ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PETERSON
as 2:2014cv01082
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BARRY K. PETERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Peterson v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv01293
Plaintiff:
Harold M. Peterson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PETERSON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03445
Plaintiff:
DIANE PETERSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSON v. REVEREND MOBOLAJI WOJUOLA et al
as 3:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE E. PETERSON, JR.
Defendant:
REVEREND MOBOLAJI WOJUOLA, JOHN W. SAWTELLE, DORINA L. VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HART v. OPPMAN et al
as 2:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER OPPMAN, GILMORE, C. J. MCKEOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS et al v. NFL PROPERTIES, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2013cv07661
Plaintiff:
JULIUS ADAMS , JERRI ADAMS , SAM ADAMS and others
Defendant:
NFL PROPERTIES, L.L.C., RIDDELL, INC., RIDDELL SPORTS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv07301
Petitioner:
GEORGE M. PETERSON
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
