Cases 101 - 110 of 362
Benitez v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00970
Petitioner:
Elder Garbriel Cruz Benitez
Respondent:
Russell Hott, Miller and Williams Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Murcia v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00845
Petitioner:
Jose Fabian Murcia
Respondent:
Russell Hott, James Mullan and William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tawalbeh v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00844
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, Jeffrey Crawford, James Mullan and others
Petitioner:
Fahed Tawalbeh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00827
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Santos Garcia et al v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv00821
Defendant:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement, Jeffrey Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Santos Salvador Bolanos Hernandez, Ismael Castillo Gutierrez, Gerson Amilcar Perez Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reedy v. Russell County VA
as 7:2020cv00408
Respondent:
Russell County VA
Petitioner:
Robert Shawn Reedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rupkey v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University et al
as 7:2020cv00394
Defendant:
Col Craig Alia, Frances B. Keene, PH.D, Major General Randal D. Fullhart and others
Plaintiff:
Liam J. Rupkey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIZAMA GUTIERREZ v. Hott
as 1:2020cv00712
Petitioner:
RODRIGO LIZAMA GUTIERREZ, Enrique Palomares Reyes, Victor Quintanilla Gallegos and others
Respondent:
Russell Hott, Chad F Wolf, Matthew T Albence and others
Mabry v. Joyner
as 3:2020cv00409
Plaintiff:
Russell L. Mabry
Defendant:
Daquan M. Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dana v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University et al
as 7:2020cv00300
Defendant:
Lieutenant Colonel Donald G. Russell, Frank Shushok, Jr., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Dana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
