Cases 101 - 110 of 138
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wright et al v. Harper et al
as 2:2011cv01998
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Wright and Laverne Wright
Defendant:
Clifton D. Harper, Tangipahoa Parish Council and Lafayette Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tommy Sanchez, Jr., et al v. Daniel Edwards, et al
as 10-31061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY FERNAND SANCHEZ, JR., HAZEL SANCHEZ, as Tutrix of minor child Tyler Sanchez and TONYA SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL EDWARDS, Sheriff, Tangipahoa Parish, HAMMOND CITY, JACOB SCHWEBEL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mercelous v. Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2010cv02458
Plaintiff:
Henry M. Mercelous, Jr.
Defendant:
Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff's Office, Daniel Edwards and Unidentified Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alfaro et al v. Illinois Central RR Co. et al
as 2:2010cv01912
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Alfaro
Defendant:
Illinois Central RR Co. and Tangipahoa Parish Council
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stoetzner v. Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2010cv01811
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Stoetzner
Defendant:
Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff's Office, Daniel Edwards, Stewart Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
