Cases 101 - 110 of 544
Ingram v. U.S. Government et al
as 1:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
DeSean Ingram
Defendant:
U.S. Government, University Hospital, CDC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1580
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Schobinger v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03007
Plaintiff:
Mark Schobinger
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc. and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
hey, inc. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 23-15911
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HEY, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shumans v. Twitter, Inc., X Corp
as 2:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Grant Parker Shumans
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Point B, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02934
Plaintiff:
POINT B, INC.
Defendant:
TWITTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Concord Music Group, Inc. v. X Corp
as 3:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Concord Music Group, Inc., Universal Music Corp. doing business as 360 Music doing business as Universal Music Works, Songs of Universal, Inc. doing business as Universal Music Works doing business as Universal Tunes and others
Defendant:
X Corp doing business as Twitter
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Taiming Zhang v. Twitter, Inc.
as 23-15868
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAIMING ZHANG
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Mike Webb v. Alfonso Lopez, et al
as 23-7072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mike Webb, Major, doing business as Major Mike Webb for VA, also known as Friends for Mike Webb, agent of Major Mike Webb for Congress, doing business as Angels of Liberty
Defendant / Appellee:
Alphonso Lopez, Jose Quiroz, in Individual and official capacity, County of Arlington and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
