Cases 101 - 110 of 3,873
Haralson v. Tile Shop, LLC, The
as 0:2023cv03214
Plaintiff:
Cheri Haralson
Defendant:
Tile Shop, LLC, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Isbell v. Polaris, Inc.
as 0:2022cv01322
Plaintiff:
Leah Isbell
Defendant:
Polaris, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Alderink v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 0:2023cv02817
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Linda Alderink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Lucero v. Atomic Provisions LLC
as 4:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Lauren Lucero
Defendant:
Atomic Provisions LLC
Hinojosa v. Gasper Trucking, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv02816
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Hinojosa
Defendant:
Gasper Trucking, LLC and Michael Gasper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Soard et al
as 1:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Allen-Michael Soard, Cape County Private Ambulance Service, Inc., John J. Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Su v. Mundwiller et al
as 4:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
David Mundwiller and Mundwiller Electric LLC doing business as Mundwiller Electric
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bente et al v. North Star Insurance Advisors, LLC
as 4:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Eric Bente and Tamara Harrison
Defendant:
North Star Insurance Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Danny Huff v. Canterbury Park Holding Corp.
as 23-3151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Danny Scott Huff
Defendant / Appellee:
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation
Morgan et al v. Ochi et al
as 4:2023cv00786
Plaintiff:
Christine Morgan and D'Andre King
Defendant:
Chukwu Emeka Ochi and King Aces Chicken & Fish LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
