Cases 101 - 110 of 65,612
Sherman v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Sherman
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Foreman v. Blessed Road Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Nikki Foreman
Defendant:
Blessed Road Inc, Jennifer N Dysart and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Mitchell v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rupert v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2024cv03013
Plaintiff:
Misty Rupert
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tate v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024cv05093
Plaintiff:
Zerahzhe Authentic Tate
Defendant:
Officer J. Jackson, Special Agent Devito and John or Jane Doe Officers or Agents #1 to #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Caremark PhC, L.L.C
as 4:2024cv04031
Plaintiff:
Kevin Flowers
Defendant:
Caremark PhC, L.L.C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05092
Plaintiff:
Ronald Moore
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Morris v. Does
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Monica Morris
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
